The Supreme Court’s recent 6-3 decision upholding border “metering” clarifies a stark legal issue: to be considered for asylum eligibility, an individual must physically set foot on U.S. soil.
However, the court left the real issue untouched. Its decision does not resolve what asylum policy at the border should look like. The majority opinion dismissed as “overstated” the warning that turning people away at official ports of entry will drive some to cross unlawfully…
more
Source www.bostonherald.com
FTC: We use income earning affiliate links. More on Sposored links.
Terms of use and third-party services. More here.
Terms of use and third-party services. More here.